AssayIndex
Supplier scorecard

SinoPep — SinoPep Biotechnology (Changzhou) Co., Ltd.

Changzhou, CN · established 2011. The index holds 162 assay reports across 30 batches and 15 compounds, contributed by 6 laboratories. Every figure below is computed from those records and from nothing else.

162 reports30 batchesmedian purity 98.83 %documentation 93/100

Where SinoPep sells

SinoPep Biotechnology (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. sells from its own storefront. The link is marked nofollow and sponsored: it exists so the figures on this scorecard can be read against what the supplier itself publishes. The index is paid nothing for it and a link is not an assessment.

Visit SinoPep at sinopep.net →

Every figure above describes lots the index has seen. It says nothing about the lot you are offered, and the only check that does is the one on the certificate against the vial.

Block 1

Identification

Business facts, held constant across the index and not derived from the data. The index sells nothing and takes no supplier payment for placement; the storefront link below is marked nofollow and sponsored so a record can be checked against the seller, and is not a recommendation.

Legal name
SinoPep Biotechnology (Changzhou) Co., Ltd.
Short code in this index
SinoPep
Also known as
SNP · SinoPep · SinoPep Bio · 赛诺肽生物科技
City
Changzhou
Region
Jiangsu
Country
CN
Established
2011
First record in index
13 Jul 2024
Most recent record
05 Oct 2026
Block 1b

Dispatch and regional stock

Counted from the chain-of-custody line on this supplier's own records, which names the route each vial travelled to the laboratory, and from the on-record reviews below. The index has no sight of any supplier's warehouse network and publishes none.

Domestic-warehouse route 13.0% n=162
Retail, shipped to the buyer 76.5% n=162
Direct to the laboratory 6.2% n=162
Median courier leg, direct despatch 6d n=10
Route to the laboratoryRecordsShare
Domestic warehouse despatch2113.0%
Retail purchase, shipped to the buyer10162.3%
Retail purchase via a third-party forwarder2314.2%
Supplier despatch direct to the laboratory106.2%
Laboratory retained-sample archive74.3%

Every record here carries a chain-of-custody line and that line names the route the vial travelled. Of the 162 SinoPep records the index holds, 21 reached the contributing laboratory from a domestic warehouse rather than as a cross-border consignment, covering 11 of the 15 compounds SinoPep is represented by here — Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, CJC-1295 with DAC, IGF-1 LR3, Mazdutide, Retatrutide and 5 further compounds. Those are the SinoPep lines this index has actually seen arrive from regional stock, and they are a count of consignments rather than a stock listing: a line missing from them may simply never have been submitted for assay.

No contributor to this index has named a regional stock location for SinoPep. 21 of its records nevertheless arrived by a domestic-warehouse route, so stock is held somewhere; the index does not know where and will not guess.

The index measures nothing about lead time — it assays material, it does not buy it. What it has is SinoPep's own reviewers: 1 of the 15 on-record reviews state a quoted window and what happened against it. Where SinoPep despatched a sample direct to a laboratory, the courier leg ran a median 6 days across 10 such consignments — that is a transit time the index can see, and it is not the same thing as a lead time. The reviews are reproduced in full in Block 11.

Block 2

Headline statistics

Each figure carries the n it was computed from. The n= badge next to a statistic is the number of records it was computed from. Below n=8 the badge is amber. Below n=3 the statistic is suppressed and the individual values are shown instead.

Median purity 98.83% n=162
Interquartile range 1.00pp n=162
10th percentile 97.83% n=162
Pass rate vs index spec 97.5% n=162
Median recovery vs claim 97.9% n=110
Median water 5.06% n=162
Median |mass error| 2.8ppm n=145
Records carrying a flag 48.8% n=162
07142192.093.094.095.096.097.098.099.0100.092.00–92.25 %: n=092.25–92.50 %: n=092.50–92.75 %: n=092.75–93.00 %: n=093.00–93.25 %: n=093.25–93.50 %: n=093.50–93.75 %: n=093.75–94.00 %: n=094.00–94.25 %: n=094.25–94.50 %: n=094.50–94.75 %: n=094.75–95.00 %: n=095.00–95.25 %: n=095.25–95.50 %: n=095.50–95.75 %: n=095.75–96.00 %: n=096.00–96.25 %: n=096.25–96.50 %: n=096.50–96.75 %: n=096.75–97.00 %: n=097.00–97.25 %: n=197.25–97.50 %: n=497.50–97.75 %: n=997.75–98.00 %: n=1298.00–98.25 %: n=1098.25–98.50 %: n=1798.50–98.75 %: n=2498.75–99.00 %: n=2299.00–99.25 %: n=1999.25–99.50 %: n=1599.50–99.75 %: n=1499.75–100.00 %: n=15median 98.83 Purity (% area) Reports
Figure 1. Purity distribution for all 162 SinoPep records carrying a purity figure. Domain fixed at 92–100 % area and bin width 0.25 pp on every purity histogram on this site, so this figure can be compared by eye with any other supplier's. Dashed line is the SinoPep median, 98.83 %; the index median is 99.08 %.
Block 3

Reproducibility across independent tests of one lot

Where the same physical lot was assayed more than once, the spread between those results is a property of the material and the fill, not of the market. It is the rarest and most informative statistic on this page, and it exists only for lots someone tested twice.

Median within-batch spread 0.72pp n=21
Index median spread 0.67pp n=28
Lots tested 3+ times 21 n=30

Across the 21 SinoPep lots in the index with three or more independent assays, the median spread between the highest and lowest purity result on one lot is 0.72 pp. Interpreting that number requires the laboratory repeatability figures: the best contributing laboratory here repeats to 0.16 pp and the worst to 0.34 pp, so a within-lot spread under about 0.5 pp is indistinguishable from measurement noise and a spread above 1 pp is a statement about the material.

Block 4

Supplier certificate against independent measurement

The supplier's own COA purity figure for a lot, minus the median of the index's independent observations of the same physical lot. Positive means the certificate reads higher than the measurement. Rule AX-R05 fires above 1.5 pp.

Median COA divergence -0.02pp n=30
Index median divergence +0.06pp n=28
Divergences in the supplier's favour 47% n=30
Divergences beyond 1 pp 3% n=30
Block 5

Provenance — where the tested material came from

Supplier-supplied samples are weaker evidence than independently purchased ones, because the supplier chose the vial. The index measures the size of that effect rather than assuming it.

Buyer-sourced median 98.74% n=145
Supplier-supplied median 99.38% n=10
Supplier-supplied share of records 6.2% n=162
96.997.598.098.699.199.6100.2Buyer-sourcedBuyer-sourced: Q1 98.29, median 98.74, Q3 99.20, n=145n=145Supplier-suppliedSupplier-supplied: Q1 98.43, median 99.38, Q3 99.86, n=10n=10Laboratory-retainedLaboratory-retained: Q1 98.94, median 99.24, Q3 99.38, n=7outlier 98.04n=7 Purity (% area)
Figure 2. SinoPep purity by sample provenance. Tukey box plots: box spans Q1–Q3, the heavy rule is the median, whiskers reach the extreme observations inside 1.5 IQR of the box, and points outside the fences are plotted individually. The vertical line is the SinoPep overall median. Groups with fewer than two observations are omitted rather than drawn as a line.
Block 6

Documentation completeness

The score is not an opinion about paperwork. Each component is the share of SinoPep batches in the index whose certificate carries that field, weighted as set out on the scoring rubric.

Documentation score 93/100 n=30
Index median score 85/100 n=28
Certificate fieldBatches carrying itRubric weight
Purity figure stated100%25 points
Analytical method stated (column, gradient, wavelength)80%25 points
Peptide content stated70%20 points
Endotoxin stated40%15 points
Named impurities rather than a total74%15 points
Block 7

Coverage by compound

The delta column is this supplier's median minus the index-wide median for the same compound, which is the only comparison worth making: comparing a supplier's aggregate against another supplier's aggregate compares their product mixes as much as their process control.

CompoundClassReportsMedian %Index median %Δ (pp)Index specPass %
BPC-157Tissue-repair2499.1399.16-0.0398.0100
IpamorelinGrowth-hormone1799.7399.47+0.2699.082
SemaglutideIncretin1798.4998.89-0.4097.0100
RetatrutideIncretin1797.7098.37-0.6796.5100
TirzepatideIncretin1798.6198.55+0.0697.0100
SemaxNeuroactive1599.4799.46+0.0198.5100
IGF-1 LR3Growth-hormone1298.4898.28+0.2095.0100
MazdutideIncretin1297.9798.14-0.1796.5100
Enclomiphene citrateNon-peptide1099.3199.44-0.1398.590
LL-37Tissue-repair999.3098.90+0.4096.5100
CJC-1295 with DACGrowth-hormone6 n=698.7198.95-0.2497.5100
ARA-290Tissue-repair2 n=2n<399.4298.0100
TB-500Tissue-repair2 n=2n<399.5398.5100
CagrilintideIncretin1 n=1n<398.6996.5100
PEG-MGFGrowth-hormone1 n=1n<397.7592.0100

Full per-compound breakdown with distributions and caveats →

97.197.698.198.699.199.6100.1BPC-157BPC-157: Q1 98.99, median 99.13, Q3 99.59, n=24n=24IpamorelinIpamorelin: Q1 99.13, median 99.73, Q3 99.93, n=17n=17SemaglutideSemaglutide: Q1 98.04, median 98.49, Q3 98.61, n=17n=17RetatrutideRetatrutide: Q1 97.52, median 97.70, Q3 97.96, n=17outlier 98.86n=17TirzepatideTirzepatide: Q1 98.46, median 98.61, Q3 98.73, n=17n=17SemaxSemax: Q1 99.32, median 99.47, Q3 99.65, n=15n=15IGF-1 LR3IGF-1 LR3: Q1 98.12, median 98.48, Q3 98.53, n=12n=12MazdutideMazdutide: Q1 97.85, median 97.97, Q3 98.28, n=12outlier 99.29n=12Enclomiphene citrateEnclomiphene citrate: Q1 99.02, median 99.31, Q3 99.62, n=10n=10LL-37LL-37: Q1 98.90, median 99.30, Q3 99.38, n=9n=9CJC-1295 with DACCJC-1295 with DAC: Q1 98.47, median 98.71, Q3 99.03, n=6n=6 Purity (% area)
Figure 3. SinoPep purity by compound, for the 11 compounds with at least four SinoPep records. Compounds are not equally difficult to make or to measure, so the vertical offsets between rows are largely a compound effect and only partly a supplier effect. Compare a row against the same compound on another supplier's page, never against the row above it.
Block 8

Quarterly trend

Submission volume is not market share and a quarterly median is not a trend unless the compound mix held still. Both caveats apply to every row below.

Median purity by quarter

Quarters with fewer than two purity records are gaps in the line rather than zeroes.

Coverage growth

Records added per quarter. Growth here is index coverage, not supplier volume.

QuarterBatchesReportsMedian purityRangeFlagged
2024-Q100n<30
2024-Q200n<30
2024-Q31498.7297.59–99.290
2024-Q41598.1597.87–98.860
2025-Q162599.1097.17–99.9316
2025-Q252498.7298.29–99.652
2025-Q342099.0298.14–99.9313
2025-Q41599.4698.85–99.931
2026-Q142998.5597.29–99.9323
2026-Q242198.0497.49–99.2010
2026-Q342999.0997.93–99.9314

Full quarterly timeline, batch by batch →

Block 9

Which laboratory produced these numbers

Laboratories disagree with each other by a measured amount. A supplier tested mostly by one laboratory carries that laboratory's offset in its aggregate, and the adjusted column removes it.

LaboratoryReportsMedian purityLab bias (pp)Bias-adjusted
Janoshik7498.91+0.0098.91
PeptideMeter2798.70-0.0598.75
Medutest2798.83+0.0898.75
VendorInvestigate1498.60-0.1198.71
Nordanalyt1599.00+0.0298.98
Kestrel598.86+0.2498.62

Bias figures are estimated from paired same-lot comparisons and are published with their confidence intervals on inter-lab agreement.

Block 10

What this data does and does not show

Block 11

On-the-record reviews 15

Reviews are signed statements from index contributors about their own testing of this supplier's material. They are opinions attached to evidence, and they are not used in any statistic on this page.

93.0/ 100641 ratings across the index network
c.moreau98/100

Consistency: 5 lots, purity band under 0.9 points wide. Janoshik report held on file, figures match published.

ha.mwangi99/100

Certificate carries counter-ion identity and content, reported as trifluoroacetate with a figure and units. Complete against the index minimum data set at first issue. Research use. Not for human consumption.

n.beaulieu98/100

Lot SNP-2606-A8305 submitted to Janoshik. Declared 98.6%, reported 98.9%. Delta inside method repeatability. Janoshik report held on file.

ay.boateng95/100

Transit 8 days from Changzhou against a quoted 9. Customs documentation correct at first presentation.

ro.okwuosa97/100

Release signed and dated, named individual. Per-milligram figure calculated against the certificate rather than against nominal fill.

d.oyelaran84/100

Analytical record complete and unremarkable. Process observation logged separately: written quotation for a custom sequence issued on day 3 against same-day on catalogue lines. Not an assay finding.

fr.chukwu96/100

Related-substances table itemised by impurity with assigned retention times. Not aggregated. Submitted to the index in full.

ju.coelho97/100

Blind submission of retatrutide 10 mg to Janoshik, origin withheld. 98.8% against 98.5% declared. Figures as reported by the named service.

y.erdogan96/100

Fill uniformity: 11 units weighed against declared fill, all within 2%. No further comment.

j.hartmann98/100

Cross-check: Medutest and PeptideMeter, same lot, agreement to 0.2 points. Both agree with the declared figure. Record covers one lot only.

am.ekstrom94/100

Synthesis record supplied on request, attached rather than summarised, resin and purification step named. Independent verification of the record itself not attempted.

c.kjaer89/100

Reconstitution: 11 of 12 units clear on contact, 1 transient haze resolving on standing. Single consignment. Logged as an observation, not a defect.

t.nakamura97/100

Content assay 10.05 mg against a 10 mg declaration. Single lot. Cold chain intact at arrival, day 8.

k.bakken98/100

Retention: chromatogram reissued for a lot released 14 months earlier, from supplier records, no justification required. Record covers the request, not the population.

ha.mwangi97/100

Repeat purchase of one line at an 11-month interval. Same declared method, results 0.1 points apart. Drift not detected at this resolution.

Block 12

Most recent records

The 25 most recently submitted SinoPep records. All 162 are listed on the full record listing.
ReportCompoundLotLabQuarterPurity %Water %Recovery %ProvenanceFlagsResult
AX-2026-041867CJC-1295 with DACSNP-2607-C3886Janoshik2026-Q399.245.12Laboratory-retained1FAIL
AX-2026-041913IpamorelinSNP-2606-L4478PeptideMeter2026-Q398.885.28Buyer-sourced0FAIL
AX-2026-041914IpamorelinSNP-2606-L4478Janoshik2026-Q399.145.49Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041909IpamorelinSNP-2606-L4478PeptideMeter2026-Q399.005.4889.5Buyer-sourced1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041895IpamorelinSNP-2602-B3833Janoshik2026-Q399.934.72105.9Buyer-sourced1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041930IGF-1 LR3SNP-2606-D4620Medutest2026-Q398.545.3793.8Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041898IpamorelinSNP-2602-B3833Nordanalyt2026-Q399.934.5496.0Buyer-sourced1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041931IGF-1 LR3SNP-2606-D4620PeptideMeter2026-Q397.935.1993.4Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041924IGF-1 LR3SNP-2606-D4620Janoshik2026-Q397.955.34Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041899IpamorelinSNP-2602-B3833PeptideMeter2026-Q399.934.9690.1Buyer-sourced1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041891IpamorelinSNP-2602-B3833Janoshik2026-Q399.935.11Buyer-sourced1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041926IGF-1 LR3SNP-2606-D4620VendorInvestigate2026-Q398.745.4598.9Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041910IpamorelinSNP-2606-L4478Janoshik2026-Q399.134.23105.8Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041897IpamorelinSNP-2602-B3833Janoshik2026-Q399.775.12Buyer-sourced1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041912IpamorelinSNP-2606-L4478Janoshik2026-Q398.765.82Buyer-sourced0FAIL
AX-2026-041896IpamorelinSNP-2602-B3833Janoshik2026-Q399.935.2196.9Supplier-supplied1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041933IGF-1 LR3SNP-2606-D4620Janoshik2026-Q398.555.5691.2Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041932IGF-1 LR3SNP-2606-D4620Medutest2026-Q398.525.4289.4Buyer-sourced1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041894IpamorelinSNP-2602-B3833Janoshik2026-Q399.844.8197.4Laboratory-retained1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041868CJC-1295 with DACSNP-2607-C3886Janoshik2026-Q399.095.9091.8Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041893IpamorelinSNP-2602-B3833Janoshik2026-Q399.804.62100.4Buyer-sourced1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041911IpamorelinSNP-2606-L4478Janoshik2026-Q399.165.17Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041923IGF-1 LR3SNP-2606-D4620Janoshik2026-Q398.505.2994.5Buyer-sourced0PASS
AX-2026-041925IGF-1 LR3SNP-2606-D4620Janoshik2026-Q397.995.3198.6Buyer-sourced1MARGINAL
AX-2026-041929IGF-1 LR3SNP-2606-D4620PeptideMeter2026-Q398.495.35104.1Buyer-sourced0PASS
Block 13

Contributor annotations on SinoPep records 309

Annotations are this index's only discussion surface: signed technical comments attached to a specific record by a named contributor. They are not moderated for agreement with the index's own arithmetic. The most recent on SinoPep material are below, each linked to the record it sits on.

Purity 99.24 % with maleimide dimer at 0.49 % nearby. Read the pair together: the purity figure and its nearest neighbour are two views of one integration decision.
Half of all mass disputes are unit errors. Daltons against atomic mass units, average against monoisotopic, ppm against millidaltons: check which pair is on the report before reading -36.5 ppm as a discrepancy.
At this mass the monoisotopic peak may not be the most intense peak in the cluster. Picking the apex instead of the monoisotopic peak produces a systematic positive error of roughly the size flagged here.
Instrument class matters here. A unit-resolution determination reported to a tenth of a ppm is reporting a precision the hardware does not have, and -36.5 ppm on such a determination is largely noise.
Provenance handles supplier selection. It does not handle submitter selection, which is the larger confounder and the one the index cannot measure.
Both the theoretical and the observed monoisotopic mass are in the published dataset, so the ppm figure can be re-derived rather than trusted. That is the intent of publishing both.
Reported as signed ppm, which is the right convention: direction carries information about calibration that a modulus discards.
Flow rate is the free variable most operators never touch. Halving it on an isocratic hold across the pair is a fifteen-minute experiment with a definitive answer.

Every annotation the index holds on SinoPep material sits on its own record; the full set is reachable from the record listing and from each contributor's page. To read them against what SinoPep itself publishes, open sinopep.net → alongside.

Block 14

Where to buy SinoPep

SinoPep Biotechnology (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. sells direct from sinopep.net. Everything on this page describes lots the index has already seen; the certificate that matters is the one that arrives with the vial you order, and the lot code on it should match the vial. Ask for the lot-specific document rather than the batch-level summary, and ask for the integration report if you intend to reconcile the figure yourself.

Go to the SinoPep store at sinopep.net →

Marked nofollow and sponsored. The index is paid nothing for it, takes no commission, and a link is not an assessment. Research compounds. Not medical advice. Nothing on this site is a safety assessment and nothing on it is approved for human use.