AX-2026-043628 · CJC-1295 (no DAC) · PPG lot PPG-2512-D7211

Section 1

Results

Measured against the index acceptance specification for the growth-hormone axis peptides class. A specification is a decision the index made; a result is a measurement. See where each threshold came from.

Parameter	Method	Result	Unit	Index spec
Purity	RP-HPLC, 25 min gradient, 214 nm	99.71	% area	≥ 98.0	PASS
Total impurities	RP-HPLC, sum of reported peaks	0.29	% area	≤ 2.0	PASS
Largest single impurity	RP-HPLC — native GRF (1-29) (−59 Da)	0.17	% area	≤ 1.00	PASS
Identity — theoretical monoisotopic mass	calculated from molecular formula	3365.7402	Da	—	NOT TESTED
Identity — observed monoisotopic mass	LC-MS, unit resolution (single quadrupole)	3365.7668	Da	—	NOT TESTED
Mass accuracy	observed vs theoretical	+7.9	ppm	± 15	PASS
Total peptide content	by difference from the gravimetric mass balance	89.56	%w/w	—	NOT TESTED
Target-compound content	total peptide content × purity	89.30	%w/w	—	NOT TESTED
Gross fill (as weighed)	five-place balance, under nitrogen	10.07	mg	10 mg declared	NOT TESTED
Recovered target peptide	gross fill × target content	8.993	mg	10 mg claim	NOT TESTED
Recovery against label claim	recovered ÷ claim	89.9	%	90.0 – 110.0	FAIL
Water content	Karl Fischer, coulometric, duplicate	5.17	%	≤ 9.0	PASS
Counter-ion (acetate)	anion-exchange ion chromatography	4.71	%	≤ 12.0	PASS
Residual solvent + inorganic residue	estimated — see /methods/residual-solvents-q3c/	0.56	%	—	NOT TESTED
Endotoxin	kinetic chromogenic LAL	0.37	EU/mg	≤ 5.0	PASS
Sterility	not ordered on this submission	not determined	—	no growth	NOT TESTED
Appearance	visual, diffuse light, black and white background	White cake, partial shrinkage from vial wall	—	white to off-white intact cake	FAIL
Reconstitution clarity	reconstituted per submitter procedure	Clear with a single visible fibre	—	clear, no visible particulates	FAIL
pH (reconstituted, 1 mg/mL)	potentiometric, two-point calibration	5.09	—	2.5 – 8.0	PASS
Retention time (observed)	RP-HPLC, 25 min gradient	10.32	min	10.89 ± 0.30 (normalised)	FAIL
Peak asymmetry (10 % height)	Ph. Eur. 2.2.46	1.35	—	0.80 – 1.50	PASS
Plate count, main peak	N = 5.54 (t/w½)²	58,208	—	≥ 20,000	PASS
Resolution to nearest impurity	vs deamidated (+1 Da)	1.14	—	no index criterion	REPORTED

Section 2

Chromatogram and peak integration

The figure is drawn from the table. It is not an independent illustration — if a number in the table changed, the trace would change with it.

Figure 1. RP-HPLC trace, 25 min gradient, 214 nm. Drawn from the peak-integration table below: peak positions are the reported retention times, peak areas are the reported area percentages, peak widths follow the reported plate count of 58,208, and skew follows the reported asymmetry factor of 1.35. Baseline noise is seeded from the report ID and is illustrative. The lower panel is the same trace at a stated vertical expansion with the slow gradient drift subtracted, because at full scale a 0.17 % impurity against a 99.71 % main peak is a line two pixels tall; the main peak runs off-scale there by design.

#	Peak	RT	Area (µV·s)	% area	Δ mass (Da)
1	CJC-1295 (no DAC) — main peak	10.32	4,846,215	99.71	—
2	native GRF (1-29) (−59 Da)	10.04	8,263	0.17	-58.995
3	des-Tyr1 (−163 Da)	9.87	2,916	0.06	-163.063
4	deamidated (+1 Da)	10.12	1,458	0.03	+0.984
5	truncated (1-24)	9.35	1,458	0.03	-570.291
Closure check — purity + Σ impurities				100.00	CLOSES

Reporting threshold 0.05 % area. Peaks below it are not reported and are therefore excluded from the total, which overstates purity by their sum — see peak integration.

Section 3

Mass spectrum and identity

Theoretical monoisotopic mass 3365.7402 Da, computed from C152H252N44O42. All ppm figures on this site are against monoisotopic values — see why that matters.

Figure 2. ESI charge-state envelope, unit-resolution instrument. Sticks are placed at m/z = (M + z × 1.007276)/z for the observed neutral mass of 3365.7668 Da. Sodium (+21.982/z) and potassium (+37.956/z) adducts are shown where the parent charge state exceeds 25 % relative abundance; they are adducts of the same molecule and are not impurities.

Charge	Theoretical m/z	Observed m/z	Δ m/z	Rel. abundance (%)
5+	674.1553	674.1606	0.0053	7.6
4+	842.4423	842.4490	0.0067	51.7
3+	1122.9207	1122.9295	0.0088	100.0
2+	1683.8774	1683.8907	0.0133	52.9

Section 4

Gravimetric mass balance

Water, counter-ion, residual and total peptide content are exhaustive and mutually exclusive categories. They must account for 100 % of the cake mass. The index closes this to within 0.02 pp and the build asserts it.

Component	Determination	%w/w of cake
Water	Karl Fischer	5.17
Counter-ion (acetate)	ion chromatography	4.71
Residual solvent + inorganic residue	estimated	0.56
Total peptide content	by difference	89.56
Total		100.00 CLOSES

Supplier certificate, as declared

The supplier's own figures for this lot, beside the independent measurement. Divergence is assessed against the batch median, not against this single report — see rule AX-R05.

Figure	Supplier COA	This report	Index note
Purity (% area)	99.87	99.71	divergence +0.22 pp vs batch median
Total impurities (% area)	not stated	0.29
Largest single impurity (% area)	not stated	0.17
Water (%)	3.4	5.17
Counter-ion (%)	not stated	4.71
Peptide content (%w/w)	91.8	89.56
Endotoxin (EU/mg)	0.21	0.37
Method stated on certificate	YES	—	column, gradient and wavelength given

Section 5

Provenance and caveats

Where a sample came from changes the weight of the evidence. The index treats it as a first-class field.

Sample provenance: Buyer-sourced
Evidentiary weight: Strongest available evidence in this index.
Chain of custody: Retail purchase → submitter (ambient, 10 d) → laboratory (courier, cold pack, 3 d) → assay.
Assay date: 15 Apr 2026
Submitted to the index: 23 Apr 2026
Laboratory: Medutest, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Method basis: 25 min gradient · unit-resolution MS
Verification status: IDENTITY CONSISTENT

What this report does not establish

That the compound is not a near-isobaric alternative. Identity was confirmed at unit mass resolution, which cannot exclude species differing by 1 or 2 Da. The specific alternatives not excluded are named in the identity block above.
That the material is sterile. Sterility was not tested.
That any other vial in the same lot has the same composition. One vial was tested. Within-lot vial-to-vial variation in this index has a median of 0.28 pp and a 90th percentile of 0.74 pp.
That any other lot from the same supplier has the same composition. Batch-to-batch variation is larger than within-batch variation for every supplier here.
That the material is suitable for administration to a human or an animal. These are research compounds. No result on this site is a safety assessment and the index takes no position on use.
That the material was manufactured by the supplier that sold it. Contract synthesis is normal in this market and twenty-nine batches in the index fingerprint to a bulk from a different company than the one named on the label.

Section 6

Annotations 4

Signed technical comments from index contributors. Not a discussion forum — annotations question or contextualise the result, and the data team replies where a reply is warranted.

diode_array23 Apr 2026

Photodiode-array spectral homogeneity across the main peak would convert 99.71 % from a good number into a checked one. It is a free measurement on any instrument that already has the detector.

buyer_sourced23 Apr 2026

Buyer-sourced through an ordinary retail order, so the supplier had no opportunity to select the vial. This is the provenance class the index weights and it is roughly 87 % of the dataset.

multiple_compare23 Apr 2026

Restricting every supplier comparison to buyer-sourced records is the sensitivity analysis the scorecards publish. On the current dataset it changes no ordering that was not already inside measurement noise.

baseline_noise23 Apr 2026

On a low-resolution pair the baseline between the peaks never reaches baseline, so any integration is an extrapolation. Stating which extrapolation was used is worth more than any threshold.

Section 7

Related records

Same batch — lot PPG-2512-D7211 n=14

Report	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Result
AX-2026-043624	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.42	4.74	—	Supplier-supplied	PASS
AX-2026-043625	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.60	4.82	—	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043626	PPG-2512-D7211	Nordanalyt	2026-Q2	99.66	4.94	92.5	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043627	PPG-2512-D7211	PeptideMeter	2026-Q2	98.97	5.10	91.9	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043629	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.67	5.21	95.0	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043630	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.66	5.11	92.5	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043631	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.55	4.79	95.2	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043632	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.60	4.87	92.6	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043633	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.64	5.48	—	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043634	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.93	5.06	—	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043635	PPG-2512-D7211	Medutest	2026-Q2	99.75	4.61	—	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043636	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.64	5.31	—	Buyer-sourced	PASS
AX-2026-043637	PPG-2512-D7211	Kestrel	2026-Q2	99.88	4.50	—	Buyer-sourced	PASS

Batch rollup and reproducibility assessment →

Cross-sections

Other recent CJC-1295 (no DAC) records in the index.
Report	Supplier	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Flags	Result
AX-2026-042942	MKM	MKM-2603-V3346	Janoshik	2026-Q3	99.52	3.43	—	Supplier-supplied	0	PASS
AX-2026-041599	QSC	QSC-2606-V7416	VendorInvestigate	2026-Q3	97.96	3.52	—	Buyer-sourced	1	FAIL
AX-2026-042784	GGPeps	GGPE-2606-E1234	Medutest	2026-Q3	98.27	4.55	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-042939	MKM	MKM-2603-V3346	PeptideMeter	2026-Q3	99.44	3.39	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-041601	QSC	QSC-2606-V7416	Kestrel	2026-Q3	98.33	4.10	—	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL
AX-2026-042945	MKM	MKM-2603-V3346	PeptideMeter	2026-Q3	99.39	3.54	—	Laboratory-retained	0	PASS
AX-2026-042786	GGPeps	GGPE-2606-E1234	Janoshik	2026-Q3	98.22	3.77	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-041602	QSC	QSC-2606-V7416	VendorInvestigate	2026-Q3	98.36	3.38	101.8	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL

Other recent PPG records in the index.
Report	Compound	Lot	Lab	Quarter	Purity %	Water %	Recovery %	Provenance	Flags	Result
AX-2026-043598	Tesamorelin	PPG-2608-A6835	Kestrel	2026-Q3	98.91	2.56	100.3	Buyer-sourced	1	FAIL
AX-2026-043597	Tesamorelin	PPG-2608-A6835	Janoshik	2026-Q3	98.54	1.15	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-043596	Tesamorelin	PPG-2608-A6835	PeptideMeter	2026-Q3	98.74	1.83	105.1	Buyer-sourced	1	MARGINAL
AX-2026-043605	Retatrutide	PPG-2604-X7060	Janoshik	2026-Q2	98.17	4.29	99.7	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-043601	Retatrutide	PPG-2604-X7060	Janoshik	2026-Q2	98.28	3.96	95.3	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-043668	AOD-9604	PPG-2602-W8018	PeptideMeter	2026-Q2	99.47	3.06	—	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-043670	AOD-9604	PPG-2602-W8018	PeptideMeter	2026-Q2	99.56	2.71	104.5	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS
AX-2026-043630	CJC-1295 (no DAC)	PPG-2512-D7211	Janoshik	2026-Q2	99.66	5.11	92.5	Buyer-sourced	0	PASS