Water content by Karl Fischer titration
Coulometric KF on lyophilised peptides: sample handling, the two things that ruin the measurement, and what a high result actually tells you.
Purity is a ratio of areas. Content is a fraction of mass. A 99 % pure vial can contain 78 % peptide, and the difference is the whole ball game.
These are two different measurements of two different things and they are routinely conflated, including on certificates.
A lyophilised vial contains four things: peptide, water, counter-ion, and residual solvent plus inorganic residue. They are exhaustive and they must sum to 100 % of the cake mass. The index publishes that mass balance on every record where the measurements exist, closed to within 0.02 pp.
Measured: purity (RP-HPLC, % area) 98.74 % water (Karl Fischer) 5.62 % TFA (ion chromatography) 7.41 % residual solvent + ash 0.48 % Gravimetric mass balance: total peptide content = 100 − 5.62 − 7.41 − 0.48 = 86.49 %w/w check: 5.62 + 7.41 + 0.48 + 86.49 = 100.00 % ✓ Target-compound content (the number that matters): target content = 86.49 × 98.74 / 100 = 85.40 %w/w Recovered mass from a vial weighing 10.00 mg gross: recovered = 10.00 × 85.40 / 100 = 8.540 mg % of a 10 mg label claim = 85.4 % A 98.74 %-pure vial delivered 85 % of its label claim. The purity figure was not wrong. It was answering a different question.
Purity is cheap, fast, and flattering. Content requires either a certified reference standard of the same compound — which for most research peptides does not exist commercially — or amino-acid analysis after acid hydrolysis, which is a day of work. Water and counter-ion each require their own dedicated instrument. A purity-only certificate costs one injection.
That is not a conspiracy, it is an economic gradient, and it is why the index treats a content figure as the single strongest signal of documentation quality on a certificate. Suppliers who state content are, in this dataset, also the suppliers whose purity figures agree best with independent measurement.
Trifluoroacetate is a heavier counter-ion than acetate — 114 Da against 60 — and a peptide with six basic residues shipped as the TFA salt carries roughly 8 % of its mass as TFA against roughly 4 % as acetate. At equal purity and equal water, an acetate-salt vial therefore contains more peptide. One supplier in this index ships acetate by default and the effect is visible in its recovered-mass distribution.
Cited because they are the documents the acceptance criteria above are taken from. The index applies them as written and states every deviation.
Coulometric KF on lyophilised peptides: sample handling, the two things that ruin the measurement, and what a high result actually tells you.
Acetate, trifluoroacetate, mesylate and the rest — by ion chromatography, with the stoichiometry check that tells you whether the number is plausible.
Acid hydrolysis followed by chromatographic quantification of the liberated residues — the reference method for content where no standard of the intact peptide exists.
The difference between an assay and an area percent, why most research peptides have no available standard, and what that costs the numbers on this site.