Peptide content versus purity — the distinction most buyers get wrong
Purity is a ratio of areas. Content is a fraction of mass. A 99 % pure vial can contain 78 % peptide, and the difference is the whole ball game.
Acetate, trifluoroacetate, mesylate and the rest — by ion chromatography, with the stoichiometry check that tells you whether the number is plausible.
A peptide with basic residues is isolated as a salt. Which salt depends on the final purification and any subsequent ion exchange, and how much of it is present depends on how many basic residues there are and how completely the exchange was driven. Counter-ion is mass in the vial that is not peptide, and it is the second-largest contributor to label-claim shortfall in this index.
Anion-exchange ion chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection is the reference technique. A hydroxide-selective column, a 10–40 mM KOH gradient, and an electrolytic suppressor resolve acetate, formate, chloride, trifluoroacetate, mesylate and phosphate in a single 15-minute run. Calibration is external, five points, against certified anion standards. Trifluoroacetate can alternatively be quantified by 19F NMR, which is more specific and less widely available.
Before accepting a counter-ion figure, predict it. Each basic residue — arginine, lysine, histidine, and the free N-terminal amine — will carry approximately one counter-ion at the pH of the final lyophilisation.
Compound: a 31-residue peptide, M = 4 113.6 Da Basic residues: 2 Arg, 1 Lys, 1 His, 1 free N-terminus → n ≈ 4 (His often unprotonated) TFA salt: mass TFA per mole = 4 × 114.02 = 456.1 Da predicted TFA % = 456.1 / (4 113.6 + 456.1) × 100 = 9.98 % Acetate salt: mass acetate = 4 × 60.05 = 240.2 Da predicted acetate% = 240.2 / (4 113.6 + 240.2) × 100 = 5.52 % Measured TFA: 7.41 % → 0.74 × predicted. Interpretation: consistent with ~3 of 4 basic sites carrying TFA. Plausible. Measured TFA: 16.8 % → 1.68 × predicted. Interpretation: not stoichiometric. Excess free acid, incomplete drying, or the wrong molecular weight was used. Query the result.
Trifluoroacetate is not inert. It is cytotoxic at concentrations reached in cell culture at ordinary peptide concentrations, which is why peptides intended for biological work are exchanged to acetate or hydrochloride. For an index of research material the relevant point is narrower: TFA is 114 Da of mass per site against acetate's 60, and at four sites on a 4 kDa peptide that is a 4.5 pp difference in how much of the vial is peptide.
| Class | Counter-ion specification |
|---|---|
| Incretin analogues | ≤ 12.0 % |
| Metabolic, GH-axis | ≤ 12.0 % |
| Repair peptides | ≤ 12.0 % |
| Melanocortin, hormonal, neuro, bioregulator | ≤ 10.0 % |
| Non-peptide adjuncts (salts) | ≤ 12.0 %, by stated counter-ion |
| Compounds with no ionisable counter-ion | not applicable — reported as such |
Cited because they are the documents the acceptance criteria above are taken from. The index applies them as written and states every deviation.
Purity is a ratio of areas. Content is a fraction of mass. A 99 % pure vial can contain 78 % peptide, and the difference is the whole ball game.
Coulometric KF on lyophilised peptides: sample handling, the two things that ruin the measurement, and what a high result actually tells you.
The mass in the cake nobody measures: DMF, DMSO, acetonitrile, DCM and TFA, to ICH Q3C(R8) classes and limits.