AssayIndex
Cross-section

MOTS-c by laboratory

The same compound measured by different laboratories on different gradients. Where the medians differ, the question is whether the material differed or the method did — and for MOTS-c, with a class minimum gradient of 15 min, the method is a live explanation.

112 recordsmedian 99.18 %spec 98.0 %
LaboratoryReportsGradientMS resolutionMedian purity %Published bias (pp)Bias-adjustedMethod suitability
Janoshik5630minHigh99.18+0.0099.18ADEQUATE
PeptideMeter2028minHigh99.30-0.0599.34ADEQUATE
Medutest1725minUnit99.18+0.0899.10ADEQUATE
Kestrel915minUnit99.37+0.2499.13ADEQUATE
VendorInvestigate7 n=732minHigh98.58-0.1198.69ADEQUATE
Nordanalyt3 n=335minHigh98.07+0.0298.05ADEQUATE
96.797.397.998.499.099.6100.2JanoshikJanoshik: Q1 98.29, median 99.18, Q3 99.68, n=56n=56PeptideMeterPeptideMeter: Q1 98.44, median 99.30, Q3 99.65, n=20n=20MedutestMedutest: Q1 98.77, median 99.18, Q3 99.61, n=17outlier 97.04n=17VendorInvestigateVendorInvestigate: Q1 98.39, median 98.58, Q3 98.94, n=7outlier 97.46n=7NordanalytNordanalyt: Q1 97.98, median 98.07, Q3 99.00, n=3n=3KestrelKestrel: Q1 98.78, median 99.37, Q3 99.93, n=9n=9 Purity (% area)
Figure. MOTS-c purity by contributing laboratory. Any offset between rows has two possible sources — a real difference in the material each laboratory happened to receive, and the laboratory's own bias — and this figure cannot separate them. The paired analysis that can is on inter-lab agreement.