AssayIndex
Cross-section

MGF by laboratory

The same compound measured by different laboratories on different gradients. Where the medians differ, the question is whether the material differed or the method did — and for MGF, with a class minimum gradient of 15 min, the method is a live explanation.

32 recordsmedian 98.73 %spec 97.5 %
LaboratoryReportsGradientMS resolutionMedian purity %Published bias (pp)Bias-adjustedMethod suitability
Janoshik2030minHigh98.73+0.0098.73ADEQUATE
PeptideMeter4 n=428minHigh98.84-0.0598.89ADEQUATE
Medutest3 n=325minUnit98.30+0.0898.22ADEQUATE
Nordanalyt2 n=235minHigh99.17, 99.04+0.02ADEQUATE
Kestrel2 n=215minUnit99.04, 98.48+0.24ADEQUATE
VendorInvestigate1 n=132minHigh97.64-0.11ADEQUATE
97.898.298.598.999.299.699.9JanoshikJanoshik: Q1 98.39, median 98.73, Q3 98.98, n=20n=20PeptideMeterPeptideMeter: Q1 98.62, median 98.84, Q3 99.04, n=4n=4MedutestMedutest: Q1 98.14, median 98.30, Q3 98.59, n=3n=3NordanalytNordanalyt: Q1 99.07, median 99.11, Q3 99.14, n=2n=2KestrelKestrel: Q1 98.62, median 98.76, Q3 98.90, n=2n=2 Purity (% area)
Figure. MGF purity by contributing laboratory. Any offset between rows has two possible sources — a real difference in the material each laboratory happened to receive, and the laboratory's own bias — and this figure cannot separate them. The paired analysis that can is on inter-lab agreement.